FIGR / UI TEMPLATE

SLA Monitor

Surface tickets approaching breach, show response-time trends, and make ownership gaps visible before customers feel them. The screen connects SLA and Queues so support agents can find the “Review risks” action while checking at risk and breached.

Use this reference when you need to design this workflow inside an existing product. The example includes practical records such as Enterprise P1 · 82% and Enterprise P2 · 94%, rather than an empty visual shell.

SLA Monitor

BUILD ON THIS

Make it yours in Figr.

Explore this screen, then bring in your own product and design system to shape the next version.

Use this template ↗

At a glance

Screen

Analytics

Primary action

Review risks

Pattern

Analytics

State

Default, loading, empty, error, permission, success

Design system

Adaptable product UI theme

What this screen helps with

Support agents need a clear “Review risks” action without losing sight of at risk, breached and the affected records. Keep the decision and its outcome clear before moving to the next task.

What to look for

  • Primary action: Review risks is clearly available where the task happens.
  • Main view: SLA keeps the starting point obvious.
  • Connected view: Queues supplies nearby context.
  • Metric: At risk is visible with a meaningful value.
  • Another signal: Breached helps people judge what to do next.
  • Representative record: Enterprise P1 · 82% makes the example specific.
  • Second record: Enterprise P2 · 94% shows the pattern works beyond one item.

States to consider

  • No data for the chosen period; show what people can do instead of leaving a blank panel.
  • Loading sla without changing the layout unexpectedly.
  • Partial or delayed metrics; explain the problem and preserve work.
  • Permission denied for queues; clarify who can continue.
  • Success after choosing Review risks; confirm the result and the next step.
  • Network or data refresh failure; offer a retry without losing context.

Where it fits

SLA → Queues → Review risks → Review outcome

Patterns in this screen

Analytics, SLA, Queues, Policies, accessible states, contextual actions

UX choices to review

Make time ranges, filters and metric units clear. Show the data behind each trend so readers can test what changed.

In this design, people should be able to compare Enterprise P1 · 82% with Enterprise P2 · 94%. Make at risk clear, then use breached to explain whether the next step needs attention.

Before handing this to a designer or engineer, check keyboard focus, error copy, permissions and what happens after they choose the “Review risks” action. The happy path alone is not enough.

Related UI examples: Ticket Detail, Help Center Admin, Support Inbox.

Try a similar screen in Figr

Design a sla monitor screen for our existing software product. Use our real design-system tokens, components and product language. Show SLA and Queues, include believable records such as Enterprise P1 · 82%, and make review risks easy to find. Map loading, empty, failure, permission and success states before you create editable high-fidelity screens.

Open Figr

KEEP EXPLORING

More ways to approach your next screen.

Browse other product UI examples, compare patterns, and pick the direction that suits your product.

Explore all 500 templates ↗