STORYBOOK & CODE CONTEXT

Bring implementation context into product design

Mature products are shaped by more than Figma files. Components have real states, props, constraints, and behavior in code. Figr can use Storybook, code, CSS, and component context where available to help teams reason through UX and generate design directions that stay closer to what the product can actually support.

Trusted by 500+ teams who value user experience
THE PROBLEM

Design systems live in Figma and in code

  • A button may look one way in Figma and behave another way in production

  • A table may have props for density, row actions, loading states, pagination, and empty states.

  • A modal may have accessibility behavior or constraints designers do not want to recreate manually every time.

When AI ignores implementation context, it can suggest designs the product system does not support well.

Figr should help bring component reality into UX work.

What context can matter

Storybook components

  • Storybook can show component variants, states, props, examples, and constraints that are useful for design generation and UX reasoning.

Code and CSS context

  • Code and styles can reveal implementation details, available patterns, spacing rules, responsive behavior, and constraints.

Design system implementation

  • For mature teams, the design system is not only a Figma file.
  • It is a working component library with rules and behaviors.

Product constraints

  • Implementation context can help Figr avoid suggesting impossible or expensive directions too early.

How teams use this

Keep AI output closer to the system

Figr can use component context to reduce invented UI and stay closer to available patterns.

Improve handoff quality

When UX decisions are tied to existing components and states, engineers get less ambiguity.

Explore within constraints

Teams can ask for design variants that respect known components, patterns, and implementation limits.

Connect product and engineering earlier

Storybook and code context help Figr serve the earlier product-design question without pretending implementation constraints do not exist.

With you at every stage of the product development process

Design with the component system in view

Bring Storybook, code, CSS, and component context into Figr so AI design work can stay closer to the product your team can build.

Frequently asked questions

Does Figr understand Storybook?
Chevron Down

Storybook and component context can be used where available to support more grounded design work.

Is this for engineers or designers?
Chevron Down

Both. Designers get output closer to the system. Engineers get UX artifacts that better reflect available components and states.

Does this replace technical feasibility review?
Chevron Down

No. Figr can help bring implementation context earlier, but engineering still owns final feasibility decisions.