Compare cohort retention over time and reveal how activation behavior, plan, and acquisition source change long-term use. The screen connects Cohorts and Retention so product analysts can find the “New cohort” action while checking d7 retention and d30 retention.
Use this reference when you need to design this workflow inside an existing product. The example includes practical records such as Activated in 1 day · 52% and Invited team · 47%, rather than an empty visual shell.

Analytics
New cohort
Analytics
Default, loading, empty, error, permission, success
Adaptable product UI theme
Product analysts need a clear “New cohort” action without losing sight of d7 retention, d30 retention and the affected records. Keep the decision and its outcome clear before moving to the next task.
Cohorts → Retention → New cohort → Review outcome
Analytics, Cohorts, Retention, Segments, accessible states, contextual actions
Make time ranges, filters and metric units clear. Show the data behind each trend so readers can test what changed.
In this design, people should be able to compare Activated in 1 day · 52% with Invited team · 47%. Make d7 retention clear, then use d30 retention to explain whether the next step needs attention.
Before handing this to a designer or engineer, check keyboard focus, error copy, permissions and what happens after they choose the “New cohort” action. The happy path alone is not enough.
Related UI examples: Funnel Analysis, Experimentation, Event Analytics.
Design a retention cohorts screen for our existing software product. Use our real design-system tokens, components and product language. Show Cohorts and Retention, include believable records such as Activated in 1 day · 52%, and make new cohort easy to find. Map loading, empty, failure, permission and success states before you create editable high-fidelity screens.