Balance project demand against team capacity, surface overloaded people, and make allocation tradeoffs explicit. The screen connects Capacity and People so product teams can find the “Assign work” action while checking team capacity and overallocated.
Use this reference when you need to design this workflow inside an existing product. The example includes practical records such as Engineering · 92% used and Design · 84% used, rather than an empty visual shell.

Analytics
Assign work
Analytics
Default, loading, empty, error, permission, success
Adaptable product UI theme
Product teams need a clear “Assign work” action without losing sight of team capacity, overallocated and the affected records. Keep the decision and its outcome clear before moving to the next task.
Capacity → People → Assign work → Review outcome
Analytics, Capacity, People, Projects, accessible states, contextual actions
Make time ranges, filters and metric units clear. Show the data behind each trend so readers can test what changed.
In this design, people should be able to compare Engineering · 92% used with Design · 84% used. Make team capacity clear, then use overallocated to explain whether the next step needs attention.
Before handing this to a designer or engineer, check keyboard focus, error copy, permissions and what happens after they choose the “Assign work” action. The happy path alone is not enough.
Related UI examples: File Review, Comments & Mentions, Docs Workspace.
Design a resource planning screen for our existing software product. Use our real design-system tokens, components and product language. Show Capacity and People, include believable records such as Engineering · 92% used, and make assign work easy to find. Map loading, empty, failure, permission and success states before you create editable high-fidelity screens.